Guest Editors: Theofilos Gkinopoulos (University of Greenwich, United Kingdom), Juliette Schaafsma (University of Tilburg, Netherlands) and Thia Sagherian-Dickey (University of Tilburg, Netherlands)
In the aftermath of historical intergroup injustices, perpetrators seek to restore positive intergroup relations by offering a public apology. Public apologies can be a powerful tool in re-examining traumatic events and important facilitator of human interactions. Worldwide history abounds with examples of political apologies, with some scholars going so far as to refer to this period as the ‘Age of Apology’. Apology offer fulfils important psychological goals and is an outcome of socio-emotional and cognitive responses. Further empirical research has identified particular linguistic and structural features that contribute to the effectiveness of apologies, and to the perceived sincerity and trustworthiness of the apology giver, leading to forgiveness, reconciliation, transitional justice and other desired outcomes. Such features concentrate around acknowledgement that a wrong has been committed, an acceptance of responsibility by transgressors, an offer by transgressors to make an atonement for the committed wrong and reassurances by the transgressor that the wrong will not be intentionally repeated again. However, research to date has left some questions open, such as potential group differences in perceptions of apologies by different socioeconomic status groups or by victims / non victims, primary and secondary victims, and even bystanders. A nuanced understanding of the role that emotions play in the processes leading to political apologies is also needed. Additionally, a more fine-grained understanding of ideological factors such as victims’ sense of shared values and beliefs toward justice should add to the overall examination of public apologies. A critical look at the different roles of apologies is important for addressing the different facets of the construct – such as their restorative nature versus whether they sustain unequal power relations.
With this special issue, we greet ongoing quantitative and/or qualitative research on the intergroup nature of public apologies and the inter-group relations they entail. We seek to understand the political relations that are formed when political – as ‘ethical’ – leaders offer apologies and how this impacts their followers’ perceptions and judgements about them. Consistent with the scope of the Journal, we welcome research using a wide range of methodologies, regular research articles, short research notes, theoretical pieces or confirmatory reports.
The special issue will contain a maximum of 6 papers plus an introduction. Submitted papers must be original manuscripts, presenting one or more empirical studies that are not under consideration by any other outlet. The papers should be about 6000-7000 words including abstract, references, tables and acknowledgements. Please note that after the review process, the guest editors submit the entire content of the special issue to the chief editors who make the final acceptance decision (cf. http://rips.ubiquitypress.com/about/). To be considered for this special issue, please submit a 500-word abstract to Theofilos Gkinopoulos (T.Gkinopoulos@greenwich.ac.uk), Juliette Schaafsma (J.Schaafsma@uvt.nl) and Thia Sagherian-Dickey (T.M.Sagherian@tilburguniversity.edu) by December 1st 2019. Authors need to include in their abstract submission whether their research was pre-registered and whether they commit to sharing their data. The Editors of the special issue will review the abstracts and invite submission of the full manuscript for the selected papers. The deadline for submission of the full manuscript is May 1st 2020.
Best regards,
Theofilos Gkinopoulos (University of Greenwich, United Kingdom)
Juliette Schaafsma (University of Tilburg, Netherlands)
Thia Sagherian-Dickey (Tilburg University, Netherlands)
Posted on 08 Oct 2019
In recent months, the "yellow vests" movement has occupied an important place in the French and international media. Given its recency, this movement has yet to be analyzed in a scientific way. In this context, the International Review of Social Psychology ( https://www.rips-irsp.com/) proposes a special issue to examine the social psychological processes involved in this movement and more broadly, in collective movements.
In this special issue, we encourage any submission that offers a social psychological analysis of collective movements such as the yellow vests. We are interested in both the determinants of engagement in the movement, the mechanisms of its evolution, and its effects on representations and intergroup relations. We welcome research that analyses, for example, the effects of identity, intergroup relations, threat, social influence, comparison and social inequality on the emergence, evolution and consequences of the movement. With respect to empirical papers that do not  investigate the Yellow Vests movement specifically, the relevance of the study for the understanding of this movement should however be provided.
The expected articles may be empirical or theoretical. The special issue will contain a maximum of 7 articles. Articles will take the form of research articles (10,000 words) or short research notes (max 3000 words). We also encourage submissions in the form of Confirmatory or Exploratory reports (see https://www.rips-irsp.com/about/submissions/).
The submission process will be divided into two stages:
A first step is to submit a 300-word Expression of Interest (abstract) by June 30, 2019.
If the expression of interest is accepted, the second step will be to submit a manuscript by October 1, 2019. The manuscript will then be submitted to an expert appraisal process.
Authors may submit their declaration of interest and manuscript in French or English, but the final version of the manuscript will necessarily be in English.
For any questions or requests for additional information, you can contact O. Klein or C. Darnon (rips-irsp@ulb.ac.be).
For more information on the international review of social psychology, check our website: https://www.rips-irsp.com/.
Posted on 29 May 2019
The special collection 'Conflicts in social influence: A Festschrift in honour of Gabriel Mugny' has now been published. The collated papers aim to celebrate the contribution of Gabriel Mugny and reflects the importance that his perspective on structuring conflicts has represented in social psychology. The special issue gathers empirical and theoretical papers that provide new areas of investigation, developments of existing paradigms, theoretical considerations on past research, and work integrating different areas of research and practice.
The full collection can be found at: https://www.rips-irsp.com/collections/special/conflicts-in-social-influence/
Posted on 08 Jan 2019
The International Review of Social Psychology (IRSP) is open for submissions and inviting authors to submit their content for consideration within the early 2019 volume. IRSP publishes empirical research in all areas of social psychology, allowing for varied and wide-ranging subject areas. Any kind of research can be considered, as long as the results significantly enhance the understanding of a general social psychological phenomenon and the methodology is appropriate.
IRSP is a fully online, 100% open access, and APC-free journal, meaning that there are no financial barriers to authors or readers, allowing for a truly global audience. Supported by the Association pour la Diffusion de la Recherche Internationale en Psychologie Sociale (A.D.R.I.P.S.), the journal operates with no author-facing Article Processing Charges (APCs), making all submissions/ publications free to all users of the journal.
Benefits of publishing with the journal include:
Please visit our website for further details. If looking to submit a paper, please read our author guidelines for information on submission requirements. If you have any questions around the journal, please feel free to get in touch.
Posted on 26 Sep 2018
Posted on 12 Sep 2018
The International Review of Social Psychology (IRSP) is open for submissions and inviting authors to submit their content for consideration within the 2018 and early 2019 volume. IRSP publishes empirical research in all areas of social psychology, allowing for varied and wide ranging subject areas. Any kind of research can be considered, as long as the results significantly enhance the understanding of a general social psychological phenomenon and the methodology is appropriate.
IRSP is a fully online, 100% open access journal, meaning that there are no subscription barriers to readership, allowing for a truly global audience. Supported by the Association pour la Diffusion de la Recherche Internationale en Psychologie Sociale (A.D.R.I.P.S.), the journal operates with no author-facing Article Processing Charges (APCs), making all submissions/ publications free to all users of the journal. The journal receives around 35,000 pages views each year and is indexed in (among others) PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science (Social Sciences Citation Index). The journal encourages data to be made openly available alongside research, and has recently introduced Registered Reports as a submission option.
Please visit our website for further details. If looking to submit a paper, please read our author guidelines for information on submission requirements. If you have any questions around the journal, please feel free to get in touch.
Posted on 01 May 2018
This format contributes to making scientific findings more reliable and replicable. The review process for Registered Reports is divided into two stages. In Stage 1, reviewers assess study proposals before data is collected. In Stage 2, reviewers consider the full study, including results and interpretation.
This format is especially useful for early career researchers, who may start writing their paper and benefit from Stage-1 acceptance before data collection.
To know more about registered reports, visit our guidelines for authors or check the Center for Open Science website.
The editorial teamPosted on 27 Sep 2017
International Review of Social Psychology is very happy to announce the launch of its latest special collection, 'Methodological resources for social psychologists'.
More than ever, methodological concerns have become central issues in social psychological research. The quality of our research is based on a solid knowledge of methodological and statistical tools proposed and discussed in the literature. The goal of the present special collection is to present in a pedagogical way recent advances in methodological or statistic tools that are useful for social psychologists.
The collection is available now, with further publications to be added soon.
Posted on 31 Aug 2017